facebook rss twitter

Ofcom's Sky consultation could result in cheaper footy on rival services

by Parm Mann on 30 September 2008, 15:54

Tags: Virgin (NASDAQ:VMED), British Telecom (LON:BT.A)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qapkj

Add to My Vault: x

The UK communications-regulator Ofcom today launched a consultation that could force Sky to make its premium content available to rival operators at regulated prices.

The consultation follows complaints from BT, Setanta, Top Up TV and Virgin Media in early 2007, a quartet who argues that Sky's dominance in Premier League football and premiere movies leaves them unable to compete.

In response, Ofcom now states that it is "consulting on its view that BSkyB has market power in the wholesale supply of this content", adding that Sky could be limiting the distribution of this content as a means to hamper the growth of its competitors.

There's no shortage of rival complaints in regards to Sky's wholesale prices, and the whole Virgin and Sky One debacle recently received huge media attention. But what is Ofcom willing to do about it? Well, its proposal is to require Sky to make its premium content available to its rivals at regulated wholesale prices.

That, in theory, could make premium material such as Sky Sports and Sky Movies available to Virgin Media, BT Vision and Freeview at cheaper prices. The thought of Freeview with an add-on Sky Sports package will have widespread appeal to every footy fan.

Ofcom states that "markets where competition is weak do not deliver the best outcomes for consumers", and adds that "consumers on a number of platforms are currently unable to access the most valuable sport and movie content".

Sky, of course, won't appreciate Ofcom's consultation plans. Having spent millions in securing the rights to the aforementioned material, it will argue that it should now be able to reap the benefits - albeit at the expense of its rivals, and possibly the consumer.

Ofcom outlines a 10-week period for its consultation, and a closing date of December 9th 2008. We'll be watching closely as regulated Sky wholesale prices could shake-up the broadcasting industry and pave the way for cheaper premium-TV packages.

Official press release: Ofcom consults on proposals to increase access by consumers to premium Pay TV content - live Premier League football and Hollywood movies



HEXUS Forums :: 10 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Speechless.

Sky pay all that money to secure exclusives, then Ofcom can jump in and force them to sell them at “regulated rates”………

Where were these governing bodies when Sentata bought up ENGLAND INTERNATIONALS exclusively and decided to keep them to raise subscription?
I fully agree with the Satanta statement above.

I feel the national games should be regulated to ensure they are viewable by all, meaning on national free to air TV.

Regards to Club teams thats fine, but the national sport should be accessable by all.

And having the critical games, like Croatia, on some two bit subscription channel that nobody subscribes to, (and those that have post horror stories about its quality and tactics on trying to cancel) should not be allowed.

With regards to the article if the premiership football comes onto Freeview for a similar price to sky's I think that will be the time sky goes out of our house completely.
That's technically not speechless, but what the heck.

Sky are the ones who bought up all the football and cricket matches that the fans used to watch for free on TV, then started selling them back to those very same people. Damn right there should be some competition in this market.

If someone came along and bought up all the sunshine then tried to sell it back to me I'd be pretty cheesed off.
Nelviticus
If someone came along and bought up all the sunshine then tried to sell it back to me I'd be pretty cheesed off.

So would most people, fortunately that's nothing at all like what is happening with these TV deals.

Were BBC/ITV getting these sports/movies for free before Sky? Hell no. Have Sky upped the amount that can be charged for them? Of course.

The bottom line is, the terrestrial channels cannot compete with Sky, even though they had a HUGE head start on them. Sky charge for a premium service that most of it's customers are happy to pay for……as the old saying goes “you get what you pay for” and when I compare Sky to another “premium” service like Virgin, there is no comparison IMO. I wonder how Virgin keep customers at all.
I dont see how having services like setanta is good for the consumer.

All you end up with is half the sport on one premium service and half the sport on the other meaning you have to pay twice to see everything. What a great deal.

It should either be everything on one service or everything for free.