facebook rss twitter

Apple grabs patent for multi-touch technology

by Tarinder Sandhu on 28 January 2009, 09:42

Tags: Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL)

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qaqt6

Add to My Vault: x

James Sherwood of Reg Hardware reports:

Apple has been granted a patent for touchscreens and related technologies, many of which have been combined to make up the iPhone.

Apple_touchscreen_patent

It sure looks like an iPhone

Patent number 7,479,949 is very abstract and wordy, yet covers a “touchscreen device, method and graphical user interface for determining commands by applying heuristics”.

The patent never refers to the iPhone specifically, but mentions many features and functions found on the phone. For example, on-screen finger swipes, a touchscreen with GUI, and “telephoning, video conferencing, e-mailing [and] instant messaging” functions.

Interesting snippets also suggest that Apple may have more features planned for the iPhone - and we’re not talking about a Nano model. For example, the patent mentions “digital videoing” and a “blogging application”.

Poorly Steve Jobs is named as an inventor on the patent, which was applied for in April 2008 but only granted seven days ago.

What Apple will do now it has the patent remains to be seen. But it’s worth remembering that Apple’s acting CEO, Tim Cook, said only last week that it won’t stand to have its intellectual property ripped off. He promised to use whatever weapons the company has at its disposal to fight those that do.

So will Apple use this patent as a means of protecting itself against the likes of Palm’s upcoming Pré? Only time will tell.



HEXUS Forums :: 9 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
How the hell can they patent something as generic as that?

Surely, that's not worth the paper its printed on?
Looks very specific to me, not generic. I think it's aimed at giving it some legal power over the devices that are designed to look just like an iphone and hence might mislead customers.
were does that leave companies like LG as i have the cookie and it has alot of features similar to an iphone but cost a third of the money and i don't have to use CR** apple software.
danroyle
were does that leave companies like LG as i have the cookie and it has alot of features similar to an iphone but cost a third of the money and i don't have to use CR** apple software.
But does it have all of the features listed in the patent? There seem to be quite a lot of things that they are just patenting use of together.
It'll be interesting to see how this affects competition. Hopefully they don't start sueing left right and centre :(