facebook rss twitter

HD plasma makers fight back with pan-European campaign

by Bob Crabtree on 24 November 2006, 10:10

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qahew

Add to My Vault: x


Sales of high-def LCD TV sets are still powering ahead of those of more expensive plasma models. At least, we've seen no figures to suggest things have change and can think of no other reason why three of the world's top plasma TV makers are announcing that they've got together to promote the claimed benefits of plasma over LCD - with a pan-European advertising campaign and a dedicated web site: http://www.plasma-lcd-facts.eu.

The logo of the campaign being run by Hitachi, Panasonic and Pioneer is:

We’re not saying Plasma TV is better.
You are.

And that claim is reckoned to be backed up by the findings of a survey of 603 randomly selected consumers in Cologne, London and Paris - carried out on behalf of the plasma makers, of course.

This is said to show that after watching both technologies side-by-side in home-like viewing conditions, plasma is,

...clearly the screen of preference, with 61 per cent of people surveyed saying plasma screens provided a sharper picture – compared to 21% who preferred LCD.


http://www.plasma-lcd-facts.eu - home page
Click image for larger version - click here to visit the site

And, according to the companies,

When it comes to perception of colour, 65% believed plasma was ahead of LCD (24%) and similarly, Plasma screens were found to provide the best quality for motion response speed (62%) versus 15% for LCD – while 23% couldn’t see the difference between one technology and the other. In terms of contrast quality, plasma was again number one, with 61% of the vote against 26% for LCD.

Before seeing the Plasma in action, perception of which format would reproduce the truest black level was very much in the balance – 37% felt it would be Plasma against 30% for LCD. After seeing the comparison however, a massive 72% felt Plasma was best for black.

Perhaps not surprisingly, the web site seems to make no mention of the relative pricing of plasma and LCD - and that's also something we're not expecting to see featured prominently in the plasma companies' joint advertising.

Thoughts on the relative benefits (and pricing) of plasma and LCD? Share them with us in this thread in the HEXUS.lifestyle forum.

HEXUS.links

HEXUS.community :: discussion thread about this article

External.links

Plasma campaign - home page



HEXUS Forums :: 13 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
Next xmas they'll release laser tellies which should be cheaper, lighter and better quality than either.. Plasma/LCD is so yesterdays news..
Thank you for those few words of wisdom!

:rolleyes:
Bob Crabtree;924897
Thank you for those few words of wisdom!

:rolleyes:

LCD/Plasma circa 20% of eyes visible colour range, laser circa 90%; laser 25% of the power requirement, longer lifetime, cheaper to manufacture, neglible response times. Do some reading young man and no need to be quite so dismissive - i'm merely pointing out that LCD/Plasma aren't long term solutions with SED and laser technologies burgeoning on release to the mainstream market. :rolleyes:
dangel
LCD/Plasma circa 20% of eyes visible colour range, laser circa 90%; laser 25% of the power requirement, longer lifetime, cheaper to manufacture, neglible response times. Do some reading young man and no need to be quite so dismissive - i'm merely pointing out that LCD/Plasma aren't long term solutions with SED and laser technologies burgeoning on release to the mainstream market. :rolleyes:

you got any links to back that up? not denying its true, just not heard about it and want to read up..


just read the site.. its very heavily bias.. and some of the ‘facts’ are nonsence
5lab
you got any links to back that up? not denying its true, just not heard about it and want to read up..


just read the site.. its very heavily bias.. and some of the ‘facts’ are nonsence

There's a lot of FUD on both sides but in _principle_ laser technologies ought to have many advantages of LCD and Plasma (both of which are far from perfect) - we'll know next year when mitsu/samsung start pushing out actual sets which we can compare. There's lots on the (near) horizon that could really push things forwards - SED, laser, nanotube, HDR displays etc. - and hopefully address some of the shortcomings of current displays. As for laser - even ignoring the bias the basic physics allow for a far greater range of colour than is achievable with LCD/Plasma; a laser can cover most of the spectrum of the eye! The problem with laser has always been producing green/blue light from semiconductive lasers with enough power - a few companies claim to have solved this and are actively working with people like Mitsu/Samsung to commercialise it. Personally I hope we do get something revolutionary as it can only serve to make the market even more cutthroat than it is now. LCDs are getting seriously cheap now..