facebook rss twitter

High-Def format war rages on, still no winner

by Steve Kerrison on 25 June 2007, 10:16

Quick Link: HEXUS.net/qai6c

Add to My Vault: x

It seems as though past format battles have instilled cautiousness into consumers and manufacturers alike; neither want to back a lame horse.

But what if both the front runners are unfit?

On a weekly basis, we see song and dance from members of both Blu-Ray and HD-DVD camps, citing triumphs over each other. For example, Blockbuster recently announced that it'd be expanding its Blu-Ray rentals into more stores, but not HD-DVD. But on the other hand, Toshiba's aggressive HD-DVD player pricing is helping shift units.

Business Week has a look at the current state of play, weighing up factors like the PS3, backing from Hollywood and PC-based HD players. Its conclusion is that it could be a while yet before a winner emerges, and that those backing the winner will probably come out of the race trampled anyway.

Of course, with the DRM infection rife in both formats, whoever wins, we all lose. Except, with a steady growth in DRM-hating types spreading the word that freedom is the answer, perhaps we'll all resort to downloading HD content from whatever clever web-2.0 upstart decides to offer it up in a nice, accessible, DRM-free way. Perhaps it really doesn't matter which format wins...



HEXUS Forums :: 10 Comments

Login with Forum Account

Don't have an account? Register today!
The competition is good, if Blueray was not here for example do you think HD-DVD would be cheaper or more expensive than it is now?

Hopefully the will battle each other until discs are 10p each and you can pick up players for under £100
I prefer Blueray :-)
Is this not causing mass delay to releases on the newer formats.

eg: I'm not buying either HD DVD or Blue Ray until things are more clear. I'm not forking out on new hardware and starting to build a new AV collection to find out that in a year the beta-max extiction has hit or that only sony pictures are released on Blue ray, that sort of thing.

Unless your using the big 8 channels on Sky HD - then at the moment HD content is low without a real gamble.
I'm in the Blu-Ray camp, not just because I have a PS3, but because I think in the long run it'll be better for us.

HD-DVD strikes me as just a bigger version of DVD, whereas Blu-Ray has various new ideas (such as the Java stuff) that it brings with it along with the greater capacity for storage (you can never have enough storage). I'm backing it.
Silent Shark;1129194
I'm in the Blu-Ray camp, not just because I have a PS3, but because I think in the long run it'll be better for us.

HD-DVD strikes me as just a bigger version of DVD, whereas Blu-Ray has various new ideas (such as the Java stuff) that it brings with it along with the greater capacity for storage (you can never have enough storage). I'm backing it.

I understand what you are saying, however the now extinct beta-max was also superior than its competition, yet it lost.

When its all done and dusted I think the cheapest player with the cheapest discs will win.
Paulm@scan;1129159
The competition is good, if Blueray was not here for example do you think HD-DVD would be cheaper or more expensive than it is now?
On the other hand, if there was only one format, you would have twice the competition between manufacturers for their share of that format. You would also get Pioneer, Panasonic, JVC, Denon and all the others entering the market sooner because there would be less uncertanty whether they were going to sell any units.

right now, there is are two questions from consumers: do i go HD? which format do i go with?

without the competing standards it's just a case of: do i go HD? and far more would say yes without that second question.

And because most of the components are different for the two formats, the IC and optics manufacturers have two products, negating some of the economies of scale they would have with just one product. this could also slow the price reductions.

So in theory, competition isn't always good :)